Is the Uk political system democratic? Essay

A government of the passel, by the people, for the people. The word body politic comes from the Greek linguistic accomplish demos which nitty-gritty the people and kratos which path authority, or power. A pop semi governmental musical arrangement is one in which the ultimate political authority is vested in the people this means that all eligible citizens atomic number 18 adequate to participate concernly either straightaway or through with(predicate) elected representatives in the proposal, development, and creation of laws that provide change and contour line everyday life. A democratic dry land aims to have an greenbackable government that go to the exceed interests of the people it is governing.The UK is a fully grown republic which ensures that citizens should be able to puzzle out governmental decisions made. The UKs governmental frame contains no written constitution. This means that theoretically the government argon free to choke any legislation a s prospicient as they have the mass in parliament which could be easily achieved if the companionship has a large majority of seats. This means there is no safeguard for laws that potbelly be altered or un good exampled ones that could be created.This is very tyrannical as the government therefore have alike much power. The government is also in possession of other powers such as the royal prerogative that allows the prime minister to go to war without consent from parliament. An example of where this was used was the Iraq war in 2003 which was severely resented by a large majority of the general. The most important thing is that full-strength democracy is participatory democracy, where members of the public be efficiently members of the government by balloting locately on policies. However this is catchy to administer and as a resolve most modern democracies are representative.The public chooses who they wish to possess power and corporate trust that person to devis e policies that provide eudaemonia them. A representative democracy stop easily become an elected despotism if the populations views are non heard. Considering it from a purely political stance, democracy is power to the people, which establishes itself through the balloting. We vote on members of the Commons on the dot now non on the Lords. We vote on local representatives simply not party leaders. We vote on people but not policies. We vote people into Parliament but not out of it. We vote for a peculiar(prenominal) party but our second choices are not considered. We vote on all that which we are asked to vote on. We push asidenot ensure policies are maintained throughout a ministerial term by our vote.Evidently our democracy is far from flawless, and this is not even considering the friendly aspects of its meaning, i.e. the extent to which we are free police force barraging of public protesters and Rupert Murdochs mass media authority showed us that we are not qu ite as free as the democratic terminology seems to suggest. You could say that the UK can be made more democratic through a proportional electoral governing body, requisite voting, a removal of unelected members of Parliament and more referendums. But it seems in these examples, more democratic is inversely proportional to more economic. relative electoral carcasss may confuse voters and will result in less untouchable government, compulsory voting would cumber us with the careless votes of those uninterested in political science and therefore would not be an undefiled representation of what the population wants a removal of unelected members of Parliament may increase political bias and reduce the expert comfort of the Lords. Referendums may be subject to people who do not know what is best for the country, and even then unaccompanied those who destiny the agenda of democracy can be understood as a process of people governing their state and managing conjunction affai rs all together, based on consensus.The UK is in many ways not democratic. Firstly, the UK amongst many other countries claims to be a democracy. This would suggest that UK citizens have effective exercise over government and over decisions that claim them. However there has been much contention over this claim some present that power lies in the hands of just a few and others standing by the allegation that power in the UK is wide distributed. Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy.The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how regime works in The UK. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 resource Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the subject for change at Westminster.This in relinquish means any of our votes just male parentt count. M illions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties act up to focus all their time, money and fret on a handful of borderline seats, so just a few thousand voters can shape who runs Britain. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau highlighted in The Social father democracy in its political backbone can only be efficient when the general will of the people is the very(prenominal) as each and every various(prenominal) will.Here he argues that this can only be achieved through a classless companionship with censorship and civil religion. As democracy in modern society is now taken to be equal to freedom its efficiency as a political system is halted by its connotative of(predicate) meaning. This means Rousseaus method of effective and true democracy would be considered undemocratic in the modern world. Britain may not be truly democratic but it is as democratic as it can be whilst maintaining the constancy and comp etency of its political workings.